Decision Time: Illuminating Performance in India’s District Courts

Co-authors: Himanshu Payal, Chiranjib Bhattacharya

Studies on court administration in India have so far focused their attention largely on caseload management and judge strength of the higher judiciary. In-depth investigations of the performance of India’s lower courts, the primary loci of a citizen’s contact with the judiciary, are rarer, largely due to the lack of available data at scale. We conduct a quantitative analysis of a large dataset of more than 1700 Indian district courts between 2010 and 2018, to assess court performance through the measure of timeliness of case disposal. We use median days to decision—the median number of days it takes for a district court in India to decide a case. We aim to understand the impact of well-established factors—working strength and tenure of judges, case administration, age distribution of cases, and category or case type—against district courts’ performance. We find that court type and nature of cases are important predictors of a district court’s performance, and that the total number of judge working days and average bench strength are not good indicators of courts’ performance—the workload per judge being actually lower in low-performance district courts, compared to high-performing courts. Our study also reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the available judicial data platforms and points toward reforms in judicial administration to address these concerns.

This publication is a research output under a collaborative project between NLSIU and IISc, Bengaluru. 

Featured in the Press

The Hindu | Administrative processes, types of cases impact performance of court significantly rather than the number of judges or total working days, finds study